Grant Funding in 2026. Let’s Not Sugarcoat It.

There used to be a book.


An enormous green bible, published by the Directory of Social Change, called the Directory of Grant Making Trusts. If you were serious about finding funders in the early 2000s, you knew this book. You probably borrowed it from your local voluntary action organisation because buying your own copy was out of the question. It cost a fortune then. It still does. A new edition still lands every year, for anyone who can stomach the price.
You sat with it, worked through it, dog-eared pages. It was heavy. It was slow. And it was the single best starting point available.

Continue reading

Your mate was wrong. And now you’ve got a problem.

1–2 minutes

I get a version of this call regularly.

Someone has set up a CIC. They registered it a few months ago, sometimes longer, on the advice of a friend who’d done it themselves, or after watching a few videos online, or after buying a course that promised to have them funded inside two months. It seemed straightforward. It was cheap to set up. They were excited.

Now they’ve had a rejection. Or two. Or they’ve applied to three funders and heard nothing back from any of them and they’re starting to wonder.

They ring me, and I ask them to send me their registration documents, and within ten minutes I can usually see exactly what happened.

The wrong structure. A board that isn’t independent. A name that shares three words with the director’s private business. A community interest statement so vague it could describe any organisation doing anything anywhere. A financial arrangement that looks, from the outside, like a mechanism for moving public money into a private enterprise.

None of it was malicious. All of it was avoidable. And most of it cannot be fixed without significant time, legal advice, and in some cases starting over.

Continue reading